<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Edovia - Blog &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edovia.com/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edovia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Blogging about iPhone apps and the overall mac industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:45:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Introducing InAppSettingsKit</title>
		<link>http://edovia.com/blog/2010/01/introducing-inappsettingskit/</link>
		<comments>http://edovia.com/blog/2010/01/introducing-inappsettingskit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lvandal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edovia.com/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should iPhone app settings be placed in Settings.app or included in-app? — There has been quite some debate on that topic and we don’t want to repeat everything all over again.
In our view, reality is that there are a lot of good reasons to take the in-app route:

Settings.app becomes a total mess with more and more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;">Should iPhone app settings be placed in Settings.app or included in-app? — There has been quite some <a href="http://blog.atebits.com/2008/12/settings-are-in-the-settings-app/">debate</a> on that topic and we don’t want to repeat everything all over again.</p>
<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;">In our view, reality is that there are a lot of good reasons to take the in-app route:</p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0px;">
<li>Settings.app becomes a total mess with more and more apps and takes long to load all apps</li>
<li>Most users simply don’t understand the mechanism and miss the settings if they are only placed in Settings.app</li>
<li>A context switch is needed to switch between settings and the app. If the app happens to be on the 16th screen, this involves quite some tapping and flicking.</li>
<li>In-App settings can instantly change the behavior of the app</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;">On the other hand, some (albeit a minority, we feel) users are used to the mechanism of Settings.app. Also, being part of Settings.app gains some user exposure and apps included there are viewed as first-class citizens by many advanced users.</p>
<h2>So how can this dilemma be solved?</h2>
<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;">Many apps decide to get rid of a Settings.app pane altogether. Interestingly, all user-installable apps from Apple are amongst them (Remote, Keynote Remote, MobileMe iDisk). Further examples are Twitterrific, AIM and countless others.</p>
<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;"><img style="max-width: 100%; float: right; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 7px; display: inline; -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 3px 3px; -webkit-border-top-left-radius: 3px 3px; -webkit-border-bottom-left-radius: 3px 3px; -webkit-border-bottom-right-radius: 3px 3px; padding: 3px; border: 1px none #bfcad5;" title="InAppSettingsKit in WhereTo" src="http://edovia.com/app/images/blog/InAppSettingsKit-WhereTo1.png" alt="InAppSettingsKit in WhereTo" width="250" height="472" />We’re proposing a second approach that we call “hybrid settings”. In this model, the user has the choice: the settings are available in Settings.app. But they’re placed in-app as well. That way, every user can decide where to edit the settings. The in-app settings are a 100% clone of the Settings.app style.</p>
<h2>How does it look like?</h2>
<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;">Well, the settings look exactly the same as in Settings.app. This consistency does make sense if we don’t want to confuse our users. In TouchPad, a “Settings” button shifts in the settings dialog. In <a title="Where To?" href="http://www.futuretap.com/whereto">Where To?</a>, the settings are entered by tapping on the i-icon on the top right of the first screen. The settings then appear with a nice flip animation known from Weather.app or Stocks.app.</p>
<h2>Can I integrate this in my app?</h2>
<p style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin: 0px;">At first, the solution was developed by Luc Vandal of Edovia and Ortwin Gentz of <a title="Futuretap" href="http://www.futuretap.com">FutureTap</a> because we both had the need. So we wrote this piece of software as a Canadian-German co-production. Then, we thought twice and felt the code might be useful for some other folks. So we decided to release “InAppSettingsKit” as open source. Check out <a href="http://www.InAppSettingsKit.com/">InAppSettingsKit.com</a> for more details. This site also <a href="http://www.InAppSettingsKit.com/apps">lists</a> all apps currently using the framework and we hope it will be adopted widely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://edovia.com/blog/2010/01/introducing-inappsettingskit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->